We
have found errors and mistakes in acupuncture studies in the
Western countries. We now focus on analysis and discussion
of improper ways of the thought, design, and performance of
acupuncture studies by researchers in Western countries. We
feel that, generally speaking, these researchers, due to
their cultural mindset, have diverted the direction of
research to understanding acupuncture as a placebo, rather
than in the improvement of acupuncture performance. This has
made already complex acupuncture research even more complex,
causing confusion. Researchers should seek a broader view of
the research area, not only expansion of his or her own
research area.
Contents
Introduction.
4
1.
Check the reason for study failure from only one side, not
both sides.
4
2.
They do not check if the acupuncture healing effect can be
improved.
5
3.
This acupuncture is not that acupuncture.
7
4.
Researchers do not realize that acupuncture is highly
personal skill-dependent therapy
8
5.
Researchers under-estimate the difficulty of acupuncture
studies.
10
6.
Researchers may not be acupuncturists.
11
7.
Improper design of the study.
11
7.1. Modified the study group to test a no-longer-natural
therapy.
11
7.2. Did not use simple
clinic
conditions to test
12
7.3. Incomplete design.
12
7.4. Starting at the same time to test long-term healing
effects of acupuncture
13
8.
Improperly evaluating the results of the study.
13
8.1. Under-estimate the specific healing effect of
acupuncture.
13
8.2. Analysis on narrowed data.
14
8.3. Improperly chose the population to review..
15
8.4. Improperly using social evidence to support scientific
conclusions
15
Summary.
16
References.
17
This book is available in amazon.com